COPs from the UN have failed and it is time for a real dose of climate realism – What will Gavin Newsom do now for a speech punch line?

As the confetti from the 2024 U.S. election settles and President-elect Donald Trump’s “drill, baby, drill” mantra echoes across the heartland, the United Nations’ annual climate circus—better known as the Conferences of the Parties (COPs)—limps into its 30th iteration in Belém, Brazil. But let’s cut the green-tinted fog: these gatherings have been a spectacular flop. Despite 29 rounds of high-minded pledges, atmospheric CO2 has ballooned from pre-industrial levels of 275 parts per million (ppm) to a choking 425 ppm today, climbing 2-3 ppm annually since 1990.

Projections? We’re barreling toward 500 ppm, with global fossil fuel demand not just holding steady but surging to meet the insatiable hunger of AI data centers, air conditioning, and desalination plants. Ecosystems meant to sequester carbon—like the Amazon rainforest—are now net emitters, thanks to relentless deforestation and burning.

Enter California Governor Gavin Newsom, stage left at COP30, clutching his script like a lifeline. In a Sao Paulo side event alongside Milken Institute CEO Richard Ditizio, Newsom dropped a zinger that’s equal parts alarm and irony: “China gets it. America is toast” if we don’t snap out of our fossil-fueled stupor and chase Beijing’s dominance in clean energy supply chains, manufacturing, and market flooding across the EU, Africa, and beyond.

It’s a punchline tailor-made for the climate fear-mongering crowd—sharp, shareable, and dripping with that Golden State exceptionalism. But as Trump prepares to gut federal climate regs and supercharge U.S. oil and gas, what’s Newsom’s encore? More virtue-signaling from Sacramento, or a reluctant pivot to the harsh economics of energy realism?

The world, you see, isn’t just warming—it’s bifurcating. As we’ve hammered home here at Energy News Beat, the global economy is splitting into rival trading blocs: one camp, led by Europe’s net-zero zealots, chases unicorn timelines that torch industries and balloon energy costs; the other, embracing pragmatic growth and fiscal sanity, bets on abundant, affordable energy to fuel innovation and prosperity.

Picture this: Europe, once the envy of green dreamers, now stares down deindustrialization’s grim reaper. High electricity prices—the highest in the developed world—have chased away steel mills (RIP Scunthorpe), refineries (Grangemouth’s ghost), and car plants, reverting auto output to 1950s levels.

The UK’s “net zero by 2050” gospel? It’s a fiscal farce, ignoring the “system costs” of intermittent renewables: you need double the generation capacity (120 GW to replace 60 GW), plus grids, batteries, and gas backups that jack up bills for everyone else.

No wonder inward investment is a trickle, and “consumption emissions” (those sneaky imports from coal-guzzling China) keep the UK’s carbon footprint stubbornly sky-high.

Contrast that with the “realist bloc” taking shape. Trump’s America is all-in on unleashing domestic fossil fuels, slashing regs, and scorning wind and solar as “blights” on the landscape—moves that could supercharge exports to allies hungry for reliable energy.

China? They’re the ultimate pragmatists: dominating solar, EVs, and batteries while quietly firing up coal plants to keep the lights on for their manufacturing empire. Brazil, COP30’s host, embodies the hypocrisy—expanding offshore oil drilling in the Amazon while delegates jet in on a new rainforest road, preaching salvation.

India, the Middle East, and Asia’s tigers are aligning here too, prioritizing growth over guilt. As one ENB deep dive puts it, net zero’s true cost is Europe’s energy future—doomed to import LNG and electricity while balance-of-payments hemorrhages and emissions merely relocate abroad.

So, what of the climate alarmists now?

Their playbook’s in tatters. Option one: Hunker down and wait out Trump’s term, betting on a 2028 blue wave to resurrect the Paris Accord’s ghosts. Newsom’s Brazil jaunt smacks of this—positioning California as the “consistent partner” for global greens, despite federal headwinds.

He’ll tout the state’s EV mandates, battery boom, and AI leadership (with streamlined permitting to juggle tech’s power thirst and sustainability). But even he admits the feds are “vandalizing” progress—code for “we’re on our own.”Option two: A great migration to the growth bloc. Will blue-state elites decamp to Texas or Florida, where cheap gas and deregulation lure data centers and factories? Or will Europe finally blink, postponing its 2040 climate targets amid French objections and voter revolt?

ENB’s been tracking this fracture: markets splitting between net-zero fiscal failures and energy-abundant winners, with LNG traders like Abaxx eyeing the arbitrage in bifurcated flows.

Chris Wright, Trump’s DOE pick, could turbocharge a U.S. rare-earth revival in two years, flipping supply chains away from China’s monopoly.

Option three—and the most likely for the die-hards—is doubling down on net zero as holy writ. Miliband-style subsidies for wood-pellet burners like Drax (Europe’s dirtiest power plant, conveniently “zero-carbon” via imported biomass) will persist, even as they subsidize emissions elsewhere.

Newsom’s punchline? It’ll evolve into a full TED Talk on “California’s defiance,” but without federal buy-in, it’s theater. The fear-mongers’ “nine times cheaper renewables” myth crumbles under scrutiny—gas is cheaper than ever, inflation-adjusted, and far less beholden to Beijing’s chains than solar panels.

The verdict? Time for climate realism, not realism’s funeral. Ditch the degree-based fever dreams (1.5°C is toast) for ppm targets that actually track net emissions.

Implement polluter-pays carbon pricing on imports and domestics alike, fund R&D in nukes and CCS (UK strengths, squandered), and admit COPs are consensus theater, not solutions. The world’s new blocs aren’t about ideology—they’re about survival. Growth-first nations will thrive; net-zero holdouts will wither.

Newsom, your move. Another toast to China’s edge, or a pragmatic toast to American energy abundance? The podium’s yours, but the audience is tuning out the fear. Welcome to the real world.

Energy News Beat: Where energy realism meets the markets. Follow us for unfiltered takes on the bifurcation ahead.

 

Got Questions on investing in oil and gas? 

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*