Germany’s Green Gamble: How Nuclear Power Could Have Saved Billions, Slashed Emissions

nuclear

Germany would have done significantly better in terms of both spending and CO2 emissions if it had gone nuclear, new report shows.

A bombshell report has found that Germany could have been more effective at reducing its carbon footprint while saving hundreds of billions of euros if it had invested in nuclear power rather than green energy projects. [emphasis, links added]

Leftist-run governments in Europe’s top economic powerhouse made a devastating error by transitioning away from nuclear power and focusing instead on so-called “renewable” sources of energy like wind and solar, says industrial engineer Jan Emblemsvåg of the University of Science and Technology in Trondheim, Norway, according to German daily Welt.

While nuclear energy accounted for around 30 percent of Germany’s electricity in the year 2000, just over two decades later in 2022, the country, under the direction of the leftist Social Democrats (SPD) and the Greens, shut down its last nuclear power plant.

Emblemsvåg, based on calculations on outcomes of other nuclear powers, found that not only would have “decarbonized more if it had invested in nuclear power plants” it also would have done so “with significantly less nominal expenditure”.

Although estimates vary on the cost of Berlin’s green transition, according to the study, since 2002, Germany has spent 696 billion euros [$744.72 billion], including 310 billion [$331.7 billion] in direct state subsidies, on renewables.

This has coincided with a 25 percent decline in carbon emissions, the Norwegian researcher found.

However, if Germany had decided to stick with nuclear power during the same time, the country would have saved 600 billion euros [$642 billion] while producing more emissions-free power than all “green” sources combined.

Additionally, if Germany had invested further in nuclear power in 2002, it could have seen emissions fall by around 73 percent (nearly three times the current rate) while still saving 300 billion euros [$321 billion] compared to the green agenda.

“Regardless of the uncertainties in the data and assumptions,” Emblemsvåg said, “there can be no doubt that Germany would have done significantly better in terms of both spending and greenhouse gas emissions than in the current energy transition.

“By and large, overall, the alternative policy of maintaining the existing nuclear power plants in 2002 and building new ones would have halved expenditure, and Germany would have achieved its climate goals… Nuclear power plants would have caused much lower costs.

Although Germany could have “already had a carbon-free electricity supply” if it had invested earlier on in nuclear, future investments are still needed for the green transition, with the management consultancy firm McKinsey estimating that around six trillion euros [$6.42 trillion] will have been spent in total by 2045.

While there were consistent warnings that the green agenda could endanger Germany’s role as the economic engine of Europe, Berlin has only decided to double down.

The previous government of Chancellor Angela Merkel was also reportedly caught flat-footed by the invasion of Ukraine in 2022, which resulted in drastic cuts to the supply of gas and oil from Russia to Germany, severely hampering its economy.

A declassified document, produced just months before the Russian invasion, revealed that the Merkel government — which at the time included current Chancellor Olaf Scholz — believed that increasing Germany’s reliance on gas from Russia through the Nord Stream pipelines would “not jeopardize the security” of energy supplies to Germany and the EU.

This proved to be a fatal miscalculation, with the pipelines being sabotaged just months later and the decision by Vladimir Putin to cut off shipments, plunging Germany into an energy crisis, with no nuclear power to fall back on.

Amid the soaring costs of energy, in addition to other industry factors, German auto giant Volkswagen is now reportedly planning on cutting staff and potentially closing factories in Germany for the first time in the history of the company.

Read more at Breitbart

Take the Survey at https://survey.energynewsbeat.com/

1031 Exchange E-Book

Crude Oil, LNG, Jet Fuel price quote

ENB Top News 
ENB
Energy Dashboard
ENB Podcast
ENB Substack

About Stu Turley 4118 Articles
Stuart Turley is President and CEO of Sandstone Group, a top energy data, and finance consultancy working with companies all throughout the energy value chain. Sandstone helps both small and large-cap energy companies to develop customized applications and manage data workflows/integration throughout the entire business. With experience implementing enterprise networks, supercomputers, and cellular tower solutions, Sandstone has become a trusted source and advisor.   He is also the Executive Publisher of www.energynewsbeat.com, the best source for 24/7 energy news coverage, and is the Co-Host of the energy news video and Podcast Energy News Beat. Energy should be used to elevate humanity out of poverty. Let's use all forms of energy with the least impact on the environment while being sustainable without printing money. Stu is also a co-host on the 3 Podcasters Walk into A Bar podcast with David Blackmon, and Rey Trevino. Stuart is guided by over 30 years of business management experience, having successfully built and help sell multiple small and medium businesses while consulting for numerous Fortune 500 companies. He holds a B.A in Business Administration from Oklahoma State and an MBA from Oklahoma City University.