Site icon Energy News Beat

How has green energy policies impacted the environment, society, and our financial systems? DOGE found that the Inflation Reduction Act was funding change.

Dan Bongino, Elon Musk and President Trump in a meeting created by Grok on X

But what change you ask, well let’s start with the Inflation Reduction Act and what the huge “Porkulus Bill” as Dan Bongino has called it and see some of the line items. We will then jump to some current publications and announcements about what DOGE has found. It is truly amazing to realize that we have been forced to participate in a money transfer program that was not designed to help humanity or the environment.

According to Grok on X, the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022 has a comprehensive scope with various funding allocations. According to information available on the web:

It’s important to note that these figures represent different aspects of the IRA’s financial impact, including direct spending, tax credits, and projected economic effects. The actual amount spent can be influenced by how quickly projects are implemented, the uptake of tax incentives, and changes in legislation or funding allocations over time.

To summarize, while exact figures for total spending from the IRA are complex due to ongoing implementation and evolving economic impacts, significant amounts have been allocated and spent, with projections suggesting the total financial commitment might exceed initial estimates.

 Step In DOGE and Elon’s Team

The Senate held a press conference with some amazing tidbits of information. I believe that we are in the beginning stages of discovering the total level of corruption in the United States and the negative impact that the Democrats, and RINOs have had on our finances and horrific negative impactful issues around the world.

One group was the EPA granted $50 Million Dollars to the organization called Climate Justice Alliance. So they went to the website and they saw the bulldozer that went through the fence when Hamas attacked Israel, and they have other renderings on their website of decolonized Palestine with the same bulldozer. If you go through more of their website you can see that they support defunding the police.

The Senate committee points out a great question; Is any of the money actually going to be used on cleaning the water, air, or any research to lower energy prices? Or is it just for political activism money?

Here are some highlights:

As of the latest updates found on the web and posts on X, the DOGE clock has tracked savings to the tune of approximately $63.39 billion in taxpayer dollars. This information was noted around February 6, 2025. Please note that this figure might have changed since the last update, as the DOGE clock updates in real-time.

So getting back to the global spending on renewable energy.

In 2024, the global investment in solar photovoltaic (PV) technology is projected to exceed $500 billion, making it the leading form of investment in electricity generation. For wind energy, although specific global figures for 2024 alone are not directly stated in the provided sources, we can infer from trends and comparative data:

Combining these insights:

Thus, the total spending on wind and solar renewable energy in 2024 is likely to be at least $500 billion for solar, with wind contributing significantly but to a lesser extent. The exact combined total for both wind and solar would require more specific data on wind investment, but it’s clear that renewable energy, particularly solar, has seen substantial financial commitment in 2024.

Without fail in every major market that is putting in large amounts of wind and solar we are seeing a huge increase in electricity prices. So called “Renewable” wind and solar is not cheaper, nor better for the enviornment.

Over the last 20 years, the global cost of electricity has shown varied trends across different regions, influenced by factors like energy policies, the mix of energy sources, economic conditions, and geopolitical events. Here’s a summarized view based on the web and X posts:

The Bottom Line:

I have said for years that the more money spent on “Renewable Wind and Solar” the more fossil fuels will be used. We see more oil and gas demand, more coal being burned and the only way to meet demand while being fiscally responsible is the addition of natural gas power stations.

Call it Turley’s Law if you would like, but it is a constant. The more we spend on non-renewable wind and solar as it should be called, the more coal, natural gas, we will use. The world would be a cleaner place with less pollution if we would cut out the fraudulent spending on “renewable energy”, and cut all the bills and government subsidies like the Inflation Reduction Act. It was used as a piggy bank and never positively impacted the United States Citizens.

As for the environment we are about to see how bad “renewables” are on the environment. As subsidies dry up around the world we are going to see who is responsible to clean up the toxic wast of the solar farms and wind farms. Right now the land owners are on the hook and it is not shaping up to be pretty. If companies start going out of business, who is going to clean up the defunckt renewable energy farms is going to be a huge financial and environmental crisis.

I for one am looking forward to more reports coming out from Elon’s DOGE team and watching more of the Democrat and RINOs trying to defend the corruption that has gone on for 50 years.

Energy policies should be made by looking at physics, science and fiscal responsibility. Our new Secretary of Energy, Chris Wright, has been vocal of not pushing the Net Zero by 2050, but rather Zero Energy Poverty by 2050. That is a great way to look at energy policies.

Exit mobile version