McKinsey warns of African shortfall amid energy transition risksThe energy transition is throwing up particular challenges for Africa, not least in terms of access to the skills and capital needed to meet future demand.

African
Picture shows; Dangote Refinery. Lagos, Nigeria. Supplied by Federal Ministry of Information and Culture, Nigeria Date;

The energy transition is throwing up particular challenges for Africa, not least in terms of access to the skills and capital needed to meet future demand.

Some countries are facing more of a challenge than others, a report from McKinsey this week said. Nigeria is highly reliant on oil, making up more than 85% of government revenues.

As companies focus on lower emission sources, African states “could find themselves deprioritised”, McKinsey said.

African projects tend to be more expensive, by around 15-20%, in addition to being 70-80% more carbon intensive than global assets. Reduced financing suggests the cost of African production will rise, which would make production less competitive globally, McKinsey said.

This squeeze comes as demand will grow by around 30% in Africa to 2040, compared with a 10% global increase.

African producers should focus on three aspects, the consultants said. Decarbonising and cost efficiency, lower carbon infrastructure, and investments in renewable energy.

Nigeria faces a particular challenge. The government has made a pledge to reach net zero by 2060, with McKinsey saying this would require a substantial increase in grid electrification. The consultants estimate there is 40-60 GW of diesel and petrol generators in Nigeria, accounting for 12% of the country’s emissions.

A shift to more gas-fired power plants would offer a way to cut emissions. Nigeria has the largest gas reserves in Africa. However, McKinsey warned demand could outstrip supply by at least 3 billion cubic feet per day by 2030.

As such, this presents an opportunity for investment in gas infrastructure. This would include pipelines, processing facilities and coastal LNG regasification in order to connect stranded reserves with domestic needs.

Skills and cash

Another risk McKinsey identified is that international players control 40% of African oil production. These companies are shifting to renewable energy, carbon reduction and cost controls. Should these companies sell out, there is a “significant risk of a technical and skills gap”.

To tackle this, countries should work on boosting local capabilities and “regional content policies”. In the longer term, regional centres of excellence could share best practice between international and national partners. This would also offer an opportunity in the energy transition space.

McKinsey gave the example of Actemium, which since 2020 has been helping oil workers transition into offshore wind.

New ways must also be found to tackle the looming shortfall in financing for Africa’s oil and gas projects.

McKinsey gave the example of the TotalEnergies-led Lake Albert project, in Uganda. This aims to have emissions of less than 20 kg of CO2e per barrel of oil, using solar power for the pipeline and offsetting carbon-intensive cooking fuels with LPG. Despite these steps, though, the project faces strong opposition aimed at getting financiers to reconsider.

The consultants also suggested domestic sources of financing. They gave the example of a recent deal by Afreximbank to provide $1 billion to Nigerian National Petroleum Corp. (NNPC).

Source: Energyvoice.com