George McMillan III, Copyright © February 14, 2025
The Wolfowitz Plan to Block Russian Natural Gas and Global Geopolitical Realignment has failed
The chief problem of Keitth Kellogg is that he mistook his mission as ending the Ukraine War to save the EU and NATO and mitigate the continual harassment from the mainstream media.
The reality is that the Wolfowitz plan to isolate and break up Russia and Iran as a means of capturing the Persian Gulf and Capsian Sea Petroleum fields and occupying the logistical supply routes has failed.
The Wolfowitz plan shifted the Brzezinski era regime-change destabilization program to a regime-change nation-building program as the means of placing US puppets in charge of the newly formed countries of Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Iran, and Afghanistan to control the pipeline supply routes to Europe and this project has failed miserably. It merely turned into a continuation of the regime-change destabilization program of Brzezinski instead.
Specifically, Kellogg and his advisors, never realized the difference between the Globalist rhetoric that “Russia is going to use natural gas as a weapon” and that “Russia is pursuing territorial expansion to revive the Soviet Empire” and the actual geostrategic reasons of super powers forming trading blocs to form a superpower-major power-vassal state hierarchy that enables superpowers to become superpowers.
Cover-for-Action Rhetoric in Contradistinction to Sea Power versus Land Power Strategies
In this context, Kellogg didn’t realize that the neoconservatives and neoliberal Gloablists in the financial and military-industrial complex sectors (a) moved the EU and NATO Eastward to extend the Super Power-Major Power-Vassal State hierarchy by including the former Yugoslavian countries and Warsaw Pact countries into new vassal states; (b) to separate Russia from the European Peninsula market place and form a superpower, major power vassal state hierarchy of their own; or (c) did not realize that the Global War on Terror rhetoric was merely the pretext for the West to move into the Middle East to secure both the Petroleum Fields and the pipeline routes to (d) thwart Russian emergence and cooperation against the Sea Powers by building overland logistical supply routes in Eurasia with China.
It is (a-d) that is achieved by (e) the underlying Sea Power Mackinder-Spykman-style Rimland strategy to encircle Russia and China as a whole. In this strategy the Afghanistan nation-building project was supposed to be a gateway into Central Asia to reinstitute the Great Game strategy of the British Empire discussed at length by Peter Hopkirk in his series of books published in the 1990s.
The “Seven Countries in Five Years” objective of the neocons discussed by General Wesley Clark during his 2007 campaign was the strategy to control the entire Middle East into Central Asia and separate Russia and China to thwart and sabotage their overland pipelines, railway, highway and port system. Brzezinski wrote about this in his 1997 book titled The Grand Chessboard.
Economic Development Strategies in Contradistinction to Geopolitical Sabotage Strategies
Disrupting the process of taking raw materials and energy and turning them into consumer products is the basis of geopolitical strategies in general and the basis of the Wolfowitz strategy in particular. The goal is to block, thwart, and sabotage all Russian and Chinese infrastructural projects in Eurasia by facilitating as many proxy wars as possible is the current reality in all of Eurasia. All the government agencies in Eurasia know this, yet the Western public is told that these covert actions are done by random terror organizations and ethnic rivalries. Who funds, trains, and equips these groups is left out of the conversation by the Western media. But the advantage of the Sea Power versus Land Power strategies is that the cui bono “who benefits” rationale makes the external instigation obvious.
The WEF Globalist Narrative Relies on No One Knowing the Grand Strategies
It is this reality that the WEF Globalists write the scripts for the mainstream cable news networks that Russia and China are going to invade their neighbors any minute, and the US needs to extend democracy wherever the petroleum and mineral reserves are and wherever the logistical supply routes are as well.
The reason is to send the lion’s share of the profits of a region to London and Wall Street just as the Structuralist and Dependency School development economists have been arguing during the entire Twentieth Century. The arguments of Raul Prebisch and Hans Singer have merit. The entire Brzezinski-Wolfowitz-RAND strategy was based on (a) putting oligarchs in charge of the Eastern European Economies to move the profits to the City of London and Wall Street, and (b) thwarting any Russian export-led growth strategy, while (c) continually informing the public that “Russia is going to attack any minute” to obfuscate the fact that the West is surrounding all three of Russia’s ports and blocking all of Russia’s pipelines.
The actual Sea Power versus Land Power strategies could be discussed by the cable news networks to inform the electorate but this is prevented. My videos with Stuart Turley go straight into “limited state” status by the YouTube gatekeepers.
The goal of the Wolfowitz strategy is to prevent Russia and China from forming a trading bloc, but the Wolfowitz plan has produced the very outcome that it was trying to prevent. Russia, China, and Iran, as well as all the other countries in Eurasia, have familiarized themselves with the Sea Power versus Land Power strategies and have read the Brzezinski, Wolfowitz, RAND strategy as well.
There are many such informative videos on YouTube, but the public does not realize their relevance enough to go down the learning curve. If someone just types “Mahan,” “Mackinder and “Spykman” into YouTube several videos will pop up, many of which will be from India where knowledge of this topic is mandatory for for the Indian civil service exams. The West clearly discourages this knowledge. I am not the only person to have geopolitical videos prohibited by YouTube.
A parallel topic that is widespread in Indian alternative media is the “why does the United States support terrorists and proxy wars” discussion which is also prevalent. The Indian government wants its military leaders and civil servants to know how the US sponsored the Mujahideen during the 1970s and 80s, and the Pashtun elements of the Operation Cyclone endeavor became the Sunni Pashtun Taliban that ended up with $80 billion worth of training and equipment and now runs Afghanistan, while Al Quaeda affiliates also run Syria currently.
Everyone in Asian media and civil service seems to be familiar with the Brzezinski-Truner Operation Cyclone type programs that the Wolfowitz strategy is based on, yet by and large the Western media knows nothing about it so the Western electorate, and even the Western military leaders, stays in the dark as well.
Instead of receiving any real news based on any real understanding of the Sea Power versus Land Power strategies, the journalists and the American public are fed a fake news diet crafted by the Wall Street and City of London financial class in one sense, which is amplified into mass conformity perfection by the chorus of USAID and the NED funded Operation Mockingbird alternative media Youtube channels who unwittingly broadcast even more fake news. The Western mainstream and Mockingbird alternative media outlets are a massive misinformation perpetual feedback loop.
The Fake News Cover for Action
The fake news such as “Russia invaded for no reason,” “Russia is going to invade Central Europe,” and Ukraine is winning the War” are trumpeted in the mainstream and Mockingbird alternative media outlets that obscure the underlying foreign policy of the US. This has occurred to such an extent that LTG Kellogg was massively misinformed as well.
The actual concern of the Brzezinski-Wolfowitz strategy was always to contain Russia and China. Professor John Lewis Gaddis has written several books on this topic and the Russians and Chinese have read them too. This is why the Russians, Chinese, and Iran have coordinated their overland logistical supply route counterstrategies to bolster each other economic development and political stability.
Putin and the “Do Nothing” Approach to Western Delusion
The Russian, Chinese, and Iranian counter strategy now has the effect of creating the very Eurasian integration economic and military blocs that the Brzezinski-Wolfowitz strategy was designed to stop. Now, all Putin has to do to realize the Ratzel, Haushofer, and Dugin Eurasian land power dream is simply “do nothing” and let the energy prices soar across Europe.
If the populist parties win in the Danube River Valley countries and rebuild Nordstream to buy Russian natural gas in Rubles to save their economies and societies, then they will have to abandon the petrodollar, the EU, and NATO that are enforcing the sanctions.
On the other hand, if the WEF globalist-backed politicians increase their lawfare and mass censorship of their rivals to win the upcoming 2025 elections, and stick to the Green New Deal net zero delusion, then all Putin has to do is to sit back and watch the deindustrialization policies to run their course and lead the West into a series of cascading bankruptcies that cannot fund their generous welfare states.
Putin and Xi will be fine with either outcome and all Putin has to do is nothing. The Kellogg Plan to deal with Putin from a position of strength was dead on arrival since it was first published back in April of 2024.
Let’s hope the elections in Central Europe are too big to rig and President Trump and Elon Musk go all in and support the populist movements across the UK and Europe. The 2026 midterms will arrive faster than anyone thinks and overcoming the mainstream media mendacity will be the biggest obstacle to overcome.
Part 4: The US Cut-off their European Allies from Affordable Energy—Now What?
Part 3: The Geopolitical Problem of the US—a German-Russo-Japanese Connection
Part 2: Pipelines and Global Political Center of Gravity Alternatives: A PMESII DIME Analysis
Part 1: Part 1:Russian Natural Gas and Geopolitical Realignment—a reverse domino theory
George McMillan Articles and Interviews: https://energynewsbeat.co/george-mcmillian/