Key European Operations (2024)	Capacity/Details
Refining Capacity	1,085 thousand barrels/day (25% of global)
Chemical Ethylene	0.4 million metric tons/year
Polyethylene	0.9 million metric tons/year
Employees	~12,000
Recent Investments (2012-2023)	€21 billion

ExxonMobil’s European assets are valued in the tens of billions, with recent divestments like the €3.3 billion sale of its majority stake in Esso France illustrating the scale.

The company is also exploring sales of chemical plants in the UK and Belgium, potentially worth up to $1 billion.

Reuters article covers Darrin Woods’ direct comments.

What’s astounding to me is the overreach not only requires us to do that for the business that we’re doing in Europe, but it would require me to do that for all my business around the world, irrespective of whether it touches Europe or not,” he said.

Woods added that ExxonMobil is actively lobbying against the directive, warning of “disastrous consequences” if it is adopted in its current form.

“We’re going to continue to try to rally basically, business leaders around the world to push back against this legislation,” he said.

Although European lawmakers are listening to the opposition from energy producers, Woods said it has not led to any substantial changes.

“If anything, it’s muddling the language up, and in my mind, opening up the exposure even greater, because you’ve increased the room for interpretation,” he said.

 

Potential Balance Sheet Impact for ExxonMobil

A forced exit from the EU would represent a material hit to ExxonMobil’s balance sheet, primarily through the loss of ongoing revenue streams and potential asset impairments or divestment losses. In 2024, ExxonMobil reported total assets of $453.5 billion, with non-U.S. long-lived assets at $115.7 billion.

While not broken out exclusively for Europe, the region’s refineries, chemical plants, and upstream assets likely account for 10-15% of non-U.S. assets, or $10-20 billion, based on capacity shares and investment history.

Losing European revenue—estimated at 15-20% of total—could reduce annual earnings by $5-7 billion, assuming proportional contributions to the company’s $34 billion in 2024 earnings.

Upstream non-U.S. earnings were $19 billion, with Europe contributing through natural gas sales at higher prices (e.g., $10.56 per thousand cubic feet).

Divestments could provide a one-time cash influx, as seen in recent sales, but would eliminate future cash flows from a region with established infrastructure.The company has already reorganized its European footprint as part of a global transformation, achieving $12.1 billion in structural cost savings since 2019, including from European assets.

However, regulatory risks like the CSDDD could trigger impairments, similar to past windfall taxes that reduced earnings by $1.1 billion in 2022.

ExxonMobil’s strong overall balance sheet—$55 billion in operating cash flow and $263.7 billion in equity—provides resilience, but an exit would accelerate its pivot away from Europe toward more favorable markets.

Impact on EU Consumers: Higher Prices and Supply RisksFor EU consumers, ExxonMobil’s exit could exacerbate energy vulnerabilities, leading to higher prices for fuels, chemicals, and everyday products. The company supplies a notable share of the EU’s refined products and chemicals, with its refineries processing over 1 million barrels per day.

Reducing this capacity would tighten supply in a market already reliant on imports, potentially increasing gasoline, diesel, and heating oil prices by 5-10% in affected regions, based on historical supply disruptions.

The EU’s oil and gas infrastructure market, valued at $115.5 billion in 2024, could face further strain, with consumers bearing the cost of sourcing alternatives from the Middle East, U.S., or Russia—options complicated by geopolitics and higher transport expenses.

Chemical shortages might raise prices for plastics and lubricants, adding to inflationary pressures amid deindustrialization trends.

Analysts warn that such exits contribute to product shortages, lost jobs, and greater import dependence, ultimately hiking costs for households and industries.

The Broader Geopolitical Realignment: Net Zero, Deindustrialization, and Trading Blocks

This standoff exemplifies the core realignment driven by net-zero policies and deindustrialization. The EU’s push for decarbonization has led to high energy costs and regulatory burdens, prompting companies like ExxonMobil to divest and redirect investments to regions with growth-oriented energy policies.

Europe risks further deindustrialization, with industries migrating to trading blocks aligned with China, which dominates clean-energy manufacturing through strategic control of supply chains for batteries, solar, and wind technologies.

China’s net-zero pledge by 2060, backed by party-state capitalism, has lowered global clean-tech costs but intensified U.S.-China tensions, with policies like tariffs and de-risking efforts aiming to reduce reliance on Chinese supplies.

Meanwhile, countries prioritizing fiscal stability—such as the U.S. and OPEC nations—form alliances focused on traditional energy for growth, contrasting with the EU’s regulatory-heavy approach.

This bifurcation could see the world split into a China-led block for manufacturing and clean tech, versus energy-aligned groups emphasizing affordability and security, potentially slowing the global transition while heightening geopolitical risks.

As Woods noted, affordability will dictate the energy transition’s pace, and Europe’s strategy may inadvertently accelerate its economic isolation.

The outcome of this dispute could reshape global trade dynamics for decades.

Got Questions on investing in oil and gas?