ENB Pub Note: This is a national security issue, and Gavin Newsom has deliberately caused it. This week’s podcast with Mike Umbro and Ronald Stein pointed out some key points. The entire transcript is here: […]
Key Points Research suggests potential summer power shortages in the U.S. grid, especially in PJM’s region, due to high demand and retiring plants. It seems likely that extreme heat could strain the grid, potentially causing […]
Key Points Research suggests the Trump team is considering executive orders to expedite nuclear power plant construction. The evidence leans toward plans to overhaul regulations and involve the Department of Defense, with goals to expand […]
Key Points Research suggests Saudi Aramco’s Q1 2025 earnings reflect lower oil prices and production cuts. Net income dropped to $26 billion, down from $27.3 billion in Q1 2024, due to market conditions. Dividends include […]
“Spark30S (Atlantic) freight rates paused their upward trend from the past two weeks, decreasing slightly by $1,750 to $39,000 this week,” Spark’s commercial analyst Max Glen-Doepel told LNG Prime on Friday. Image: Spark Meanwhile, Spark25S […]
![There is no question that the Biden Administration used the United States Strategic Petroleum Reserve for political gain when it opened and caused significant drawdowns right before the mid-term elections. The Strategic Petroleum Reserve: Background, Authorities, and Considerations - EveryCRSReport.com Key Points The Biden administration significantly depleted the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), but replenishment efforts have restored much of it. There is no conclusive evidence of physical damage to SPR facilities, though concerns were raised and debated. The impact on U.S. energy security remains controversial, with critics arguing it weakened reserves and supporters saying it was necessary for market stability. Depletion and Replenishment The Biden administration released about 180 million barrels from the SPR in 2022, reducing it to its lowest level since 1983. By March 7, 2025, the SPR held 395.3 million barrels, showing recovery, but it's still below pre-Biden levels of 638 million barrels. Replenishment efforts, including purchasing oil at lower prices, have been ongoing, with plans to add more in 2025. Physical Damage Concerns about damage to the SPR's underground salt caverns were raised, especially by Republican lawmakers, but the administration stated in April 2023 that no damage occurred. No recent reports confirm physical damage, and the SPR remains operationally ready. Strategic Impact The drawdowns aimed to lower gasoline prices during a global crisis, reducing prices by up to 42 cents per gallon in 2022. Critics argue this weakened energy security, while the administration says it was necessary and the SPR's role is less critical with increased domestic oil production. Survey Note: Detailed Analysis of Biden Administration's Impact on the Strategic Petroleum Reserve The Biden administration's management of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) has been a focal point of energy policy debates, particularly concerning its drawdowns, replenishment efforts, and potential physical and strategic impacts. This note provides a comprehensive overview, drawing on official reports, congressional correspondence, and news analyses, to address the extent of "damage" done to the SPR as of May 10, 2025. Background on the SPR The SPR, established in 1975 under President Gerald Ford, is the world's largest emergency oil stockpile, with a capacity of 714 million barrels stored in underground salt caverns along the Texas and Louisiana Gulf Coasts. It was created to mitigate supply disruptions, such as those during the 1973–1974 oil embargo. The current inventory, as of March 7, 2025, stands at 395.3 million barrels, equating to about 19 days of U.S. oil consumption at 2023 levels or 47 days at 2024 import levels (Strategic Petroleum Reserve (United States)). Drawdowns Under Biden The Biden administration initiated significant drawdowns from the SPR, particularly in response to global oil price spikes following Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. On March 31, 2022, President Biden announced the release of 180 million barrels over six months, the largest drawdown in SPR history. Between 2021 and mid-2023, a total of approximately 290 million barrels were sold, reducing the SPR's inventory from 638 million barrels when Biden took office to around 347 million barrels by June 2023—the lowest since 1983. This represented a 46% reduction, as noted in a 2023 POLITICO article (Biden sold off nearly half the U.S. oil reserve. Is it ready for a crisis?). The drawdowns were part of a strategy to stabilize global markets and lower domestic gasoline prices, with the Treasury Department estimating a reduction of up to 40 cents per gallon in 2022 (The Price Impact of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Release | U.S. Department of the Treasury). However, this move drew criticism, particularly from Republicans, who argued it was politically motivated to influence the 2022 midterms rather than addressing a true emergency (Rodgers, Barrasso Call Out Biden Administration for Continued Abuse of Strategic Petroleum Reserve). Replenishment Efforts To address the depletion, the Biden administration implemented a three-part strategy announced in early 2023, focusing on direct purchases, exchange returns, and canceling mandated sales. By November 2024, the DOE had purchased 59 million barrels at an average price of under $76 per barrel, securing a total of 200 million barrels at $74.75 per barrel, fully offsetting the 180 million barrels sold in 2022 (Biden-Harris Administration Makes Final Purchase for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve - Secures 200 Million Barrels at a Good Deal for the American ...). As of November 2024, the SPR held nearly 390 million barrels, and by March 7, 2025, it reached 395.3 million barrels, showing significant recovery (Strategic Petroleum Reserve (United States)). The administration continues to purchase oil, with a recent acquisition of 2.4 million barrels for delivery in April-May 2025 (US buys oil for Strategic Petroleum Reserve into May next year | Reuters). The DOE emphasized that these purchases were made at a lower price than the sales, saving taxpayers money and maintaining the SPR's operational readiness (Office of Petroleum Reserves | Department of Energy). Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm stated in March 2024 that the SPR would return to pre-drawdown levels by year-end, factoring in canceled mandated sales (US aims to return emergency oil reserve to prior levels by year-end | Reuters). Allegations of Physical Damage Concerns about physical damage to the SPR's infrastructure, particularly the underground salt caverns, emerged during the drawdowns. Republican lawmakers, including Cathy McMorris Rodgers and John Barrasso, raised these concerns in a November 2022 letter to DOE Secretary Jennifer Granholm, noting that the rapid depletion "may have caused damage to the SPR’s pipelines and caverns, compromising its ability to meet its energy security mission" (Barrasso, Rodgers Press DOE about Damage Caused by Biden’s SPR Drawdown - U.S. S...). They requested documentation on damages and increased maintenance requirements, highlighting the SPR's subterranean nature and the potential for cavern deformation (McMorris Rodgers, Barasso Press DOE about Damage Caused by Biden's SPR Drawdowns - Cathy McMorris Rodgers). An X post from April 2025 claimed that Energy Secretary Chris Wright stated the rapid draining damaged half of the facilities, with repair costs estimated at $100 million. However, this claim lacks official confirmation, and a 2023 Reuters report cited the administration refuting Republican concerns, with Kathleen Hogan stating in April 2023 that the 2022 sales "did not damage our SPR pipelines or caverns" (Biden admin says Republican concerns about oil reserve damage unfounded | Reuters). The DOE also noted that geoscientists at Sandia National Laboratory continue to monitor cavern integrity, ensuring operational readiness. Some sources, like the Cape Charles Mirror, mentioned general risks of salt dissolution when fresh water is pumped in during drawdowns, potentially damaging the caverns, but these are not specific to Biden's actions and reflect long-term maintenance challenges (Biden depletes Strategic Petroleum Reserve – CAPE CHARLES MIRROR). Given the lack of definitive evidence and the administration's assurances, it seems likely that no significant physical damage occurred, though the controversy persists. Strategic and Energy Security Impact The drawdowns raised significant concerns about U.S. energy security, with critics arguing that depleting the SPR left the nation vulnerable to future oil supply disruptions, especially amid Middle East tensions. The SPR's level fell to 351 million barrels by October 2023, equivalent to about 56 days of U.S. oil imports, compared to a peak of 727 million barrels in 2009 (Biden sold off nearly half the U.S. oil reserve. Is it ready for a crisis?). Republicans, such as Barrasso, criticized the moves as politically motivated, suggesting they were timed to lower gas prices before the 2022 midterms (Barrasso, Rodgers Blast Biden Administration for Continued Abuse of Strategic Petroleum Reserve). The administration defended the drawdowns as necessary to stabilize global markets post-Ukraine invasion, arguing that the SPR's role is less critical given increased domestic oil production. Energy Secretary Granholm stated in 2023 that she was not concerned about reserve levels, emphasizing ongoing maintenance and the Life Extension 2 program (Biden administration releasing 1 million barrels of gasoline from reserve in bid to lower prices | PBS News). The DOE also highlighted that the U.S. exceeds International Energy Agency requirements for 90 days of net import coverage, suggesting the SPR's strategic necessity has diminished (SPR Quick Facts | Department of Energy). Gasoline Price Impact and Political Context The 2022 releases were credited with reducing U.S. gasoline prices by 13 to 42 cents per gallon, though prices remained 70% higher than when Biden took office due to broader market factors (The Price Impact of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Release | U.S. Department of the Treasury). Critics, including some analysts, argue that high prices were driven more by demand suppression than SPR releases and that Biden's energy policies, such as restrictions on domestic production, exacerbated price volatility (Biden drains Strategic Petroleum Reserve for a bump in the polls). The timing of the drawdowns, particularly the 180 million barrel release in an election year, fueled accusations of political motivation. The administration, however, framed these actions as part of a broader effort to protect American consumers and businesses during a global energy crisis, with coordinated releases from international partners (Biden-Harris Administration Makes Final Purchase for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve - Secures 200 Million Barrels at a Good Deal for the American ...). Detailed Inventory and Operational Status To provide a clearer picture, here is a table summarizing key SPR inventory levels and actions under the Biden administration: This table highlights the significant drawdown and subsequent recovery, with ongoing purchases aimed at further replenishment (SPR Quick Facts | Department of Energy, Strategic Petroleum Reserve (United States)). David Blackmon on the Daily Caller writes: Joe Biden and his appointees took an abundance of costly and damaging policy actions during his four-year term in office. Fortunately, that damaging agenda was limited to a single term presidency by voters last November who had grown weary of footing the massive bills for it all in the form of constantly increasing prices for all forms of energy. Now the task of cleaning it all up and repairing the damage falls to President Donald Trump and his appointees. In another fortunate development for America, the President has chosen an eager and extremely talented array of energy-related appointees, including EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, and Energy Secretary Chris Wright. One of the costliest actions taken by ex-President Biden related to U.S. national security came when he decided to raid the Strategic Petroleum Reserve by using it as a campaign tool to influence the 2022 mid-term elections. Early that year, Biden invoked a program to rapidly deplete the contents of the SPR, pulling 1 million barrels per day from the underground salt caverns which hold the crude for 180 days in hopes of lowering gas prices at the pump. In an interview this week with radio host Glenn Beck, Secretary Wright revealed that, by drawing the volumes down so rapidly, Biden caused damage to the integrity of those salt caverns so severe that his Energy Department will now have to spend a big piece of its budget repairing the infrastructure before the caverns can be refilled. “[Biden] flooded the market with oil, reduced the price of oil in the short term but at the cost of U.S. strategic positioning, and they damaged the facilities in the Strategic petroleum reserve by draining them so fast,” Wright told Beck, adding, “We have to spend over $100 million to repair the damage of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve that wasn’t built for that.” Conclusion The Biden administration's SPR drawdowns significantly reduced the reserve's quantity, with levels dropping to historic lows, but replenishment efforts have restored it to 395.3 million barrels as of March 7, 2025. The strategic impact remains debated, with critics highlighting energy security risks and the administration defending the actions as necessary for market stability. Chris Wright, Secretary of Energy, has to have some proof of the damage to have made those statements. I believe him and am looking for more sources to verify the damage. David Blackmon is a great author with an outstanding take on most things. Given the ongoing replenishment and lack of verified physical damage, it seems likely that the SPR's long-term integrity is intact, though the controversy around its use persists. We should, however, ask Congress to do its job and write regulations that clearly outline the use of the SRR. That seems unlikely, though, considering the number of non-American first Republicans. And that is The Crude Truth Key Citations Rodgers, Barrasso Call Out Biden Administration for Continued Abuse of Strategic Petroleum Reserve Biden-Harris Administration Makes Final Purchase for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve - Secures 200 Million Barrels at a Good Deal for the American ... Biden sold off nearly half the U.S. oil reserve. Is it ready for a crisis? Barrasso, Rodgers Press DOE about Damage Caused by Biden’s SPR Drawdown - U.S. S... Biden admin says Republican concerns about oil reserve damage unfounded | Reuters Strategic Petroleum Reserve (United States) - Wikipedia US buys oil for Strategic Petroleum Reserve into May next year | Reuters SPR Quick Facts | Department of Energy US aims to return emergency oil reserve to prior levels by year-end | Reuters The Price Impact of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Release | U.S. Department of the Treasury Office of Petroleum Reserves | Department of Energy Biden administration releasing 1 million barrels of gasoline from reserve in bid to lower prices | PBS News Biden drains Strategic Petroleum Reserve for a bump in the polls Biden depletes Strategic Petroleum Reserve – CAPE CHARLES MIRROR Republicans launch newest fight against Biden's oil drawdowns - POLITICO Barrasso, Rodgers Blast Biden Administration for Continued Abuse of Strategic Petroleum Reserve McMorris Rodgers, Barasso Press DOE about Damage Caused by Biden's SPR Drawdowns - Cathy McMorris Rodgers DAVID BLACKMON: Chris Wright Has To Clean Up Joe Biden’s Mess](https://energynewsbeat.co/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/SPR--326x245.jpg)
There is no question that the Biden Administration used the United States Strategic Petroleum Reserve for political gain when it opened and caused significant drawdowns right before the mid-term elections. Key Points The Biden […]
ENB Pub Note: The EV markets should be supported by the open market and not subsidies. For example, the Tesla charger network, built with no subsidies, is nationwide. As of January 2025, Tesla’s Supercharger network […]
ENB Pub Note: This article from the NY Post has some interesting cost formulas. While I have said that the more money invested in “renewable” wind, solar, and hydrogen will result in more fossil fuels […]
Weekly Daily Standup Top Stories Why Spain’s Rooftop Solar Owners Weren’t Spared From the Blackout May 4, 2025 Clark Savage ENB Pub Note: Rooftop solar panels on homes are not bad; they must be appropriately designed […]
Despite the rumors during bond turmoil, foreigners kept buying Treasuries and the “basis trade” didn’t blow, but the “swap spread trade” made a mess.
Copyright © 2025 | Sandstone Group