Earnings from existing oil and gas reserves can be used to fuel investment in new, clean energy solutions.
Recent news that oil major ExxonMobil (XOM -0.39%) purchased drilling rights in the potentially lithium-rich Smackover formulation in Arkansas is more symbolic than game changing right now. Still, symbols matter, and the move highlights an investment case for exploration- and production-focused companies like ExxonMobil and Chevron (CVX 0.16%) that goes beyond their role as fossil fuel providers.
Here’s why investors should closely examine what’s going on in the sector.
ExxonMobil’s move
The company’s investment in lithium assets, although tiny in terms ExxonMobil’s existing assets, matters because of lithium’s use in electric vehicle (EV) batteries. Investing in the metal is often championed by speculators focused on the clean-energy transition theme. It’s an argument that has led investors to pay high multiples for clean energy stocks and relatively low multiples to traditional energy companies.
The low multiples haven’t gone unnoticed by investors like Warren Buffett, and stocks like Chevron and Occidental Petroleum make up major holdings in Berkshire Hathaway‘s portfolio. Still, many in the investment community remain concerned by the existential threat posed to fossil fuel companies by the rise of renewable energy.
Why ExxonMobil and Chevron will remain highly relevant
The clean energy argument is compelling. After all, renewable energy sources are essentially free, and their growth is supported by an increasingly favorable political and regulatory environment. As such, companies with the industry know-how and capital to invest in clean energy solutions can be seen as attractive.
But here’s the thing. There’s no reason why companies like ExxonMobil and Chevron can’t be those companies.
- They already possess the industry knowledge and existing relationships to transition to clean energy sources, and both companies are actively investing in low-carbon solutions.
- The new energy transition will not happen overnight, and the capital to invest in it can come from cash flows generated by oil majors’ fossil fuel assets, and
- Fossil fuels will still be a massive part of the global economy — irreplaceable in many applications — and the pacing of the transition is still subject to debate.
As such, instead of thinking of oil majors as dinosaurs, investors might think of them as being well-funded players ready and willing to finesse a transition to new/clean energy.
Both have substantive reserves from which to generate cash flows. ExxonMobil has 17.7 billion barrels (bbls) in oil reserves, while Chevron has 11.2 billion. For an understanding of what those figures mean, consider that Chevron’s production was 1.1 billion bbls in 2022 while ExxonMobil’s was 3.7 billion. As such, they both have multi-years’ worth of production in reserves, and the potential to replace reserves through investment.