In a rapidly escalating geopolitical drama, U.S. President Donald Trump has issued a stark warning to Canada: proceed with a new trade partnership with China, and face a blanket 100% tariff on all goods entering the United States. This threat comes on the heels of Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney’s announcement of a strategic agreement with Beijing, aimed at bolstering ties in energy, clean technology, agriculture, and trade. For Canada, a nation deeply intertwined with the U.S. economy—particularly in the energy sector—this hypothetical hammer blow could trigger profound economic repercussions. But what would it actually cost Canada in dollars, jobs, and growth? Let’s break it down based on current trade data and economic analyses.
The Deal in Question: Canada’s Pivot to China
Earlier this month, on January 16, 2026, Prime Minister Carney unveiled a “strategic partnership” with China during a visit to Beijing.
The agreement focuses on mutual tariff reductions and collaboration in key areas, signaling Canada’s intent to diversify away from over-reliance on the U.S. market amid ongoing trade tensions.
Key elements include:Tariff Cuts on Electric Vehicles (EVs): Canada will slash its tariffs on Chinese-made EVs from 100% to 6.1% for the first 49,000 units imported annually.
This could accelerate Canada’s transition to green energy by making affordable EVs more accessible, potentially boosting adoption in the transportation sector.
Agricultural Relief: In exchange, China will lower tariffs on Canadian canola seed to around 15%, along with reductions on other agri-food products like barley and pork.
This addresses long-standing barriers that have hampered Canadian farmers since the 2019 Huawei dispute.
Energy and Clean Tech Collaboration: The pact emphasizes joint efforts in clean energy, climate competitiveness, and technology.
While details are sparse, it opens the door for increased Canadian fossil fuel exports to China—such as liquefied natural gas (LNG) or oil sands products—alongside investments in renewables. China has also committed to “considerable investments” in Canada’s auto sector, which could include battery production tied to energy storage.
Bilateral trade between Canada and China stood at about C$115 billion in 2025, with Canada exporting C$44 billion (mostly commodities like canola, wood pulp, and minerals) and importing C$71 billion (electronics, machinery, and vehicles).
The deal could boost Canadian exports to China by 10-20% in the short term, adding C$4-8 billion annually, primarily in agriculture and energy-related goods.
Alberta’s Potential Secession’s Price Tag: Billions in Oil Exports at Stake
Alberta’s economy is oil-centric, producing about 85% of Canada’s crude—over 4 million barrels per day (b/d) in 2025, with total output hitting record highs in July at around 4.1 million b/d.
Exports to the U.S. account for nearly 84% of Alberta’s crude, valued at C$120-150 billion annually.
Under Trump’s tariffs, a unified Canada would see these exports crippled, with demand plummeting 40-60% and losses of C$200-300 billion economy-wide.
But secession changes everything. As an independent, landlocked nation, Alberta would need to negotiate transit rights for pipelines like Trans Mountain through British Columbia or directly with the U.S.
Analysts suggest this could lead to favorable U.S. deals, avoiding tariffs and boosting exports by securing premium prices—potentially adding C$10-20 billion in revenue for Alberta alone.
However, risks abound: Stranded assets from disrupted infrastructure could cost tens of billions, and a devalued Canadian dollar post-secession might inflate import costs for the new nation.
For the remaining Canada, losing Alberta’s oil revenue—key to federal budgets—could trigger a 2-4% GDP drop, exacerbating the tariff hit.
The China deal’s benefits, like increased agri exports (C$4-8 billion), would be overshadowed, with no offset for the energy void.
Trump’s Tariff Threat: A Sledgehammer to North American Trade
President Trump fired off the warning via social media on January 24, 2026: “If Canada makes a deal with China, it will immediately be hit with a 100% Tariff against all Canadian goods and products coming into the U.S.A.”
This isn’t idle rhetoric; it echoes Trump’s broader “America First” agenda, which has already imposed tariffs on allies to counter perceived threats from Chinese influence.
The U.S. is Canada’s largest trading partner by far, accounting for 67-75% of Canadian exports in recent years.
In 2024, Canada exported US$420 billion worth of goods to the U.S., including critical energy supplies.
A 100% tariff would effectively double the cost of these goods for American buyers, likely slashing demand and crippling cross-border supply chains.
The Staggering Cost to Canada: Billions in Lost Exports
Economists warn that such tariffs would deliver a “massive blow” to Canada’s economy, far outweighing any gains from the China deal.
Based on models from past trade wars, a 100% blanket tariff could reduce Canadian exports to the U.S. by 40-60%, translating to an annual loss of C$200-300 billion (US$150-220 billion) in export revenue.
This doesn’t include secondary effects like supply chain disruptions or retaliatory measures.
In the energy sector alone—central to Canada’s economy—the impact would be acute. Canada supplies about 25% of U.S. crude oil imports, valued at over C$120 billion annually.
A 100% tariff could force U.S. refineries to seek alternatives, potentially idling Alberta’s oil sands and LNG projects. While the China deal might open new markets for Canadian energy (e.g., increased LNG exports to Asia), these would pale in comparison, adding perhaps C$5-10 billion at best.
Overall GDP contraction could reach 2-4% in the first year, exacerbating inflation and weakening the Canadian dollar.
For context, during the 2018-2019 U.S.-China trade war, similar tariffs shaved 0.5-1% off Canada’s growth due to spillover effects.Key Products at Risk: Energy, Autos, and Agri Lead the ListA 100% tariff would hit every Canadian export, but the heaviest toll would fall on high-volume sectors integrated with U.S. markets. Here’s a breakdown of major products and their 2025 export values to the U.S.:
|
Product Category
|
Annual Export Value to U.S. (C$ Billion)
|
Potential Impact
|
|---|---|---|
|
Crude Petroleum & Energy Products
|
120-150
|
Severe; U.S. could shift to domestic or Middle Eastern sources, hitting Alberta hard. China deal might divert some LNG, but volumes are limited.
|
|
Vehicles & Auto Parts
|
80-100
|
Devastating for Ontario’s manufacturing hub; integrated supply chains (e.g., Ford and GM plants) could halt, with ripple effects on EV transition.
|
|
Machinery & Equipment
|
50-60
|
Disruptions in aerospace and heavy machinery exports, affecting Quebec and Ontario.
|
|
Wood Products & Lumber
|
20-30
|
Construction slowdown in U.S. housing market would slash demand, impacting British Columbia’s forestry.
|
|
Minerals & Metals (e.g., Aluminum, Steel)
|
40-50
|
Echoes of 2018 tariffs; smelters in Quebec and B.C. face closures.
|
|
Agricultural Products (e.g., Canola, Grains)
|
15-20
|
Farmers gain from China tariff cuts but lose bigger U.S. market; net negative.
|
Data sourced from 2025 trade figures.
The energy sector stands out for Energy News Beat readers: Canada is the U.S.’s top foreign energy supplier, and tariffs could accelerate a shift away from fossil fuels, ironically aligning with the China pact’s clean tech focus—but at a steep short-term cost.
Core Provisions of USMCA Relevant to the Crisis
The USMCA isn’t just a tariff-reduction pact; it’s a framework designed to counter global trade distortions, particularly from non-market economies like China. A pivotal clause is Article 32.10, which addresses free trade agreements (FTAs) with non-market countries.
If one party (e.g., Canada) enters such an FTA, the other parties (the U.S. and Mexico) have the right to terminate the USMCA after six months’ notice and revert to bilateral agreements. This “poison pill” was inserted during negotiations under Trump’s first term to prevent backdoor access for Chinese goods into the U.S. market via allies.
In practice:Tariff-Free Trade at Risk: Currently, over 85% of Canada-U.S. trade flows tariff-free under USMCA exemptions.
Termination could expose Canadian exports—valued at over $420 billion annually—to World Trade Organization (WTO) baseline tariffs or higher rates imposed unilaterally by the U.S.
Notification Requirements: Canada must notify the U.S. and Mexico at least three months before finalizing any FTA with a non-market economy, allowing time for consultations.
Prime Minister Mark Carney’s recent Beijing visit may already be testing these waters.
Trump’s 100% tariff threat, posted on social media, goes beyond USMCA’s formal mechanisms, signaling a willingness to use executive authority for broad-based penalties.
This echoes his past actions, like the 2018 steel and aluminum tariffs on Canada, which were later resolved but caused short-term disruptions.
Economic Impacts on Canada and the Energy Sector
For Canada, invoking Article 32.10 could be catastrophic, amplifying the losses outlined in our previous analysis. Economists project that USMCA termination would slash Canadian GDP by 1-2% annually, with ripple effects across integrated industries.
Key implications include:Energy Exports Hammered: Canada exports $120-150 billion in crude oil, natural gas, and refined products to the U.S. yearly, mostly tariff-free.
A 100% tariff or post-termination hikes could make these uncompetitive, forcing U.S. refineries to pivot to domestic shale or imports from the Middle East. This threatens Alberta’s oil sands and LNG projects, potentially idling 200,000+ jobs in extraction and pipelines. While the China deal promises new markets, infrastructure bottlenecks limit quick diversification.
Supply Chain Disruptions: USMCA’s rules of origin require 75% North American content for autos and machinery to qualify for zero tariffs.
If terminated, cross-border energy equipment (e.g., pipelines, rigs) could face duties, inflating costs for U.S. firms reliant on Canadian components. Recent studies highlight how Chinese goods are already circumventing U.S. tariffs via Mexico and Canada, a trend Trump aims to curb.
Broader Trade War Risks: Retaliatory tariffs from Canada could target U.S. energy exports like LNG to Asia, escalating into a full-blown dispute.
Mexico, caught in the middle, might side with the U.S. to avoid similar threats, isolating Canada further.
Job Losses: Hundreds of Thousands in the Crosshairs
The human cost would be immense. Trade-dependent industries employ millions, and tariffs could trigger widespread layoffs. Estimates from similar scenarios suggest:Total Job Losses: 800,000 to 1.5 million nationwide, pushing unemployment from 6-7% to 8-10%.
By Sector:
Energy & Resources: 200,000-300,000 jobs at risk in oil sands, pipelines, and mining.
Manufacturing (Autos, Machinery): 300,000-500,000, concentrated in Ontario and Quebec.
Agriculture & Forestry: 100,000-200,000, offsetting some China deal gains.
Services & Supply Chains: 200,000+ indirect losses in logistics, retail, and finance.
These figures draw from analyses of past U.S. tariffs, which already caused 33,000 job losses in goods-producing sectors in early 2025.
For energy workers, the double whammy of lost U.S. demand and uncertain Chinese investment could lead to prolonged downturns in regions like Alberta.
Broader Economic Impact: A Risky Bet on Diversification
Signing the China deal offers modest upsides—enhanced agri exports, cheaper EVs for consumers, and potential energy investments worth billions.
It aligns with Carney’s vision of adapting to “new global realities,” reducing U.S. dependency from 75% to potentially 60% of exports over time.
However, the tariffs would overwhelm these benefits. Canada’s economy, already strained by 2025’s trade slowdowns, could enter recession, with inflation spiking 1-2% from higher import costs and a weaker loonie.
Integrated sectors like energy and autos face existential threats, while small gains from China (e.g., C$2-3 billion in agri boosts) wouldn’t compensate for U.S. losses.In the energy realm, this could hasten a pivot to Asia, but at what price? Canada’s oil exports might find new buyers in China, but infrastructure limitations (e.g., lack of West Coast pipelines) cap the potential. Ultimately, the deal represents a high-stakes gamble: short-term pain for long-term resilience.
As negotiations unfold, Energy News Beat will monitor how this impacts global energy flows.
For now, Canada’s choice could redefine North American trade—and its economy—for years to come.
Get your CEO on the podcast: https://sandstoneassetmgmt.com/media/
Is oil and gas right for your portfolio? https://sandstoneassetmgmt.com/invest-in-oil-and-gas/
Be the first to comment