Hours After the Diesel Deal, a Russian Fuel Terminal Caught Fire. Trump Has Pressed Kyiv to Stop at Least Four Times

Diesel Downstream ENB Pub Note ENB Publisher Picks Energy Crisis Energy Policy Exports Geopolitical Geopolitical International News Top News

By Stuart Turley, host of the Energy News Beat podcast  •  Published Oct. 10, 2026  •  Strike, reactions, prices and storm data as of 6:30 a.m. CT, Sat., Oct. 10, 2026  •  Follows our Friday report, Trump Says Russia Will Supply Diesel

If you haul freight, plant wheat or heat a house with oil, this weekend’s news lands on the same number: the price of a gallon of diesel. AAA had it at $6.2824 on Saturday morning, up less than half a cent from Friday (AAA). “Every $1 increase per gallon in fuel costs our members around $400 more per week,” said Todd Spencer, president of the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (Truckers News).

On Friday, President Trump said Russia would sell diesel to the U.S. and world markets, starting with about 300,000 tons, and Treasury issued a license to allow it (last night’s report). A few hours later, drones hit Rostov-on-Don, and a fuel terminal there caught fire. Then Axios reported that Trump made the deal after Kyiv ignored his requests to stop hitting Russian refineries (Axios). ENB counted those requests. We found at least four since September, plus two 2025 energy-truce agreements Kyiv joined.

Stu’s Take

I have said for years that energy is national security, and this weekend proves it from both ends. Washington wants Russian diesel to keep American trucks rolling. Kyiv says those barrels pay for the missiles hitting its power grid.

Here is the point: one terminal fire in Rostov does not move your pump price today. Markets were closed when it happened; the terminal is not on the Baltic route Moscow’s recent diesel exports have used, and nobody has shown how bad the damage is. What does matter is the pattern. Four documented U.S. requests since September, and the strikes keep coming. If Moscow’s promised cargoes depend on refineries Ukraine keeps hitting, the deal is only as good as the next night’s air defense.

My advice: budget for diesel above $6 through the fall, and watch the first tanker loadings, not the press releases.

And it is not just 6 days’ worth of diesel that could hit the US market; it is a carrot to end the war. Make no mistake: Zelensky sees it as a way to end the war, and you see all the signs of the EU prepping for a war the people don’t want but the leaders need to stay in power. I hope President Trump gets the US out of NATO before that happens – just saying.

This brings up bigger questions. Why is the US still supporting Zelensky when he canceled all elections? Well, it makes sense, as we can’t have fair elections in the US without millions of illegals voting, so something reeks of corruption. And you notice I said Zelensky and not Ukraine. I vote to get rid of all corrupt politicians regardless of country.

I will be covering this on the next Energy News Beat Stand Up

 

What happened in Rostov

As of 6:30 a.m. CT Saturday. Rostov and Moscow time is CT plus 8 hours.

Rostov Gov. Yuri Slyusar posted at 3:36 a.m. local time (7:36 p.m. CT Friday) that air defenses were repelling an attack on the city, that “a fire broke out,” and that no one was hurt (Slyusar via TVGram). By morning he said more than 100 drones had been destroyed or suppressed across the region, six people were injured, homes and a railway bridge were damaged, two vessels were hit at Azov, and a fire at “warehouse industrial facilities” was being put out (RTVI; Kommersant; RIA Novosti, state media). He did not name the terminal. Russia’s Defense Ministry said it downed 560 Ukrainian drones over 17 regions overnight, Rostov among them (Kommersant; Sputnik, state media).

Which facility burned comes from independent analysts, not officials. An OSINT analyst at the Russian outlet ASTRA geolocated resident videos to the Yug Rusi oil-loading terminal, the Rostov branch of the Novoshakhtinsk refinery (NZNP), in the city’s Zheleznodorozhny district. The Kyiv Independent said it “could not independently verify the footage or determine the extent of the damage” (Kyiv Independent; UNN). NASA’s public fire data show heat detections in southwest Rostov-on-Don from 6:44 p.m. CT Friday, still there at 1:48 a.m. CT Saturday (NASA FIRMS; Appendix F). That fits a fire in the area but does not by itself pin it to the terminal. ENB found no Maxar, Planet or Airbus imagery, and Ukraine’s military has not claimed the attack.

The company lists the terminal at 3.5 million tons a year of receiving and shipping capacity, served by five river-sea tankers. NZNP says this fleet ships only about 1.5 million tons a year; it also has three Aframax storage tankers (NZNP). ASTRA, as reported by Ukrinform and Kyiv Post, put its design capacity near 2.5 million tons (Ukrinform; Kyiv Post). Both figures cover all petroleum products, not diesel alone.

Is this the deal’s diesel?

As of 6:30 a.m. CT Saturday. No source ties this terminal to the cargoes in the deal.

Probably not. Reuters calls the Baltic port of Primorsk “one of the country’s largest export gateways” (World Ports, Reuters). Rostov is a river and Azov Sea terminal that ships toward the Black Sea, and S&P Global found Russia’s Black Sea diesel exports fell to zero in the week to Sept. 24, with that week’s 81,000 tons all leaving from Primorsk (Hellenic Shipping News, Platts, Oct. 1). Russia also bans diesel exports by producers through Oct. 31 (Anadolu).

Still, the size comparison is striking. Converted at EIA’s diesel factor, the terminal’s 3.5 million tons a year works out to about 71,500 barrels a day. Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak’s October tranche of 300,000 tons works out to about 72,200 b/d (TASS, state media; ENB calculation). But that is nameplate for mixed products, and the damage is unknown, so it is not lost diesel supply (Chart 4)

Chart 4. Novak’s promised tranches, Russia’s recent seaborne diesel exports and the Rostov terminal’s nameplate, in barrels per day. Sources: Kpler via FT/Kyiv Post; Vortexa via Bloomberg/Mezha; TASS (state media); NZNP; ASTRA via Kyiv Post. ENB calculation at 7.46 bbl/t.

 

How many times has Trump pressed Kyiv?

As of 6:30 a.m. CT Saturday. Full table with quotes and links in Appendix D.

A U.S. official told Axios Zelensky ignored “half a dozen” requests, without listing them (Axios). ENB can document at least four times since September that Trump or his envoys pressed Ukraine to stop energy strikes, two in public and two reported in private:

  • 13, 2026 (public). In Ireland: “Mr. Zelenskyy has to do one thing. He has to stop knocking out diesel fuel in Russia” (CBS/AP; Politico Europe).
  • 20, 2026 (reported private). On a call, a senior Ukrainian official told the FT, Trump’s message was “diesel, diesel … diesel” (Irish Times, FT).
  • 27, 2026 (public). In a Fox News interview reported Sept. 27–28, Trump recounted telling Zelensky at the U.N., “You got to take it easy on the refineries.” Zelensky said after that Sept. 22 meeting there were “no requests” for a unilateral halt, so ENB counts the exchange once (Ukrainska Pravda; Ukrinform).
  • 9, 2026 (reported private). In Miami, envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner told Ukraine’s team Trump would act because Kyiv “ignored multiple requests,” Axios reported (Axios; Kyiv Post).

Two earlier entries are agreements, not requests. In March 2025, Kyiv joined two U.S.-brokered energy truces: after a Trump-Zelensky call, the White House said “the two leaders also agreed on a partial ceasefire against energy,” and after the Riyadh talks it cited Trump and Zelensky’s “agreement to ban strikes against energy facilities” (White House; White House).

ENB did not count posts that blame the strikes or announce an agreement, such as Trump’s Sept. 14 claim that “Ukraine has agreed not to hit Russian Energy targets,” which Ukrainian officials disputed (Truth Social archive). The pressure is not new: under President Biden, the FT reported in March 2024 that Washington urged Kyiv to stop hitting refineries (Kyiv Independent). Trump has also encouraged the campaign at times. He posted in August 2025 that it is “very hard, if not impossible, to win a war without attacking an invader’s country,” and the WSJ and FT reported U.S. intelligence support for energy strikes (Truth Social archive; Kyiv Independent, WSJ; Kyiv Post, FT).

Chart 1. Documented U.S. requests (numbered 1–4), the two 2025 energy-truce agreements (A–B), encouraging or enabling moves, and selected Ukrainian strikes on Russian energy. Sources: White House; Anadolu; CBS/AP; Politico Europe; FT via Irish Times and Kyiv Post; Ukrainska Pravda; Axios; WSJ via Kyiv Independent; Truth Social archive; Reuters; Argus.