In the ever-volatile world of global energy markets, January 2026 brought a notable dip in OPEC’s crude oil production, largely attributed to political upheaval in Venezuela. According to recent surveys, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) pumped an average of 28.83 million barrels per day (bpd), marking a decline of 230,000 bpd from the previous month.
This drop comes amid a U.S.-led intervention that captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro in early January, leading to a blockade on Venezuelan oil exports and further straining the nation’s already beleaguered oil sector.
While other OPEC members initiated a planned production freeze, Venezuela’s turmoil accounted for about a third of the overall reduction, highlighting the fragility of supply chains in politically unstable regions.
Breaking Down the Numbers: OPEC’s January Output
OPEC’s collective output in January 2026 stood at 28.83 million bpd, a figure that reflects not just Venezuela’s challenges but also the group’s strategic decision to hold steady amid seasonal demand weaknesses.
Venezuela, once a powerhouse producer with outputs exceeding 3 million bpd in the late 1990s, saw its production plummet to around 934,000 bpd in November 2025, before further disruptions in January.
By 2025, Venezuelan output had already fallen to as low as 840,000 bpd due to years of sanctions, mismanagement, and infrastructure decay.
The recent U.S. blockade halved exports in December 2025, dropping them to about 500,000 bpd, and prompted state-run PDVSA to cut production further as storage capacity ran out.
This decline is stark when viewed against Venezuela’s vast reserves—the world’s largest at over 300 billion barrels.
Yet, chronic underinvestment has left the industry in tatters, with production now representing less than 1% of global demand.
The U.S. intervention, including the seizure of tankers and plans to control idle crude stocks, could eventually pave the way for recovery, but experts warn it may take years and billions in investment to restore output to even 2 million bpd.
OPEC+ Production Quotas and Cuts: A Cautious Approach
In response to these dynamics and broader market conditions, OPEC+—which includes OPEC members and allies like Russia—has opted for stability. At a meeting in early January 2026, the group reaffirmed its decision to pause output hikes for January, February, and March, citing low seasonal demand in the Northern Hemisphere.
This freeze follows a gradual unwind of cuts in 2025, where eight key members (Saudi Arabia, Russia, UAE, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Iraq, Algeria, and Oman) increased targets by about 2.9 million bpd.
However, the alliance still has around 3.24 million bpd of voluntary cuts in place, representing about 3% of global demand.
Adding complexity, several members have overproduced relative to their quotas, prompting updated compensation plans submitted to the OPEC secretariat. Iraq, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and Oman have committed to extra cuts totaling 4.333 million bpd between January and June 2026 to offset prior excesses.
Kazakhstan faces the heaviest burden, with reductions escalating from 503,000 bpd in January to 669,000 bpd by June.
Iraq’s plan includes cuts of 140,000 bpd in January, tapering to 79,000 bpd in June, amounting to about 614,000 bpd overall.
These measures underscore OPEC+’s commitment to market balance, with the next full meeting slated for June 2026.
Venezuela, as an OPEC founding member, has been granted exemptions from strict quotas due to sanctions and low output, but its situation adds uncertainty to the group’s dynamics.
Analysts note that while short-term disruptions may nudge prices up, a persistent supply glut—projected to exceed demand by up to 2 million bpd in 2026—could cap gains.
The Bigger Picture: Lagging Exploration and Impending Supply Crunch
While OPEC’s immediate focus is on stabilizing output, a deeper issue looms: chronic underinvestment in new oil discoveries. Global conventional discovered volumes have plummeted from over 20 billion barrels of oil equivalent (boe) per year in the early 2010s to just 5.5 billion boe annually from 2023 through September 2025.
Exploration expenditures have hovered between $50 billion and $60 billion yearly, far below the 2013 peak of $115 billion.
Upstream capital expenditure is projected at around $570 billion for 2025, but nearly 90% of this—about $500 billion—is allocated to offsetting natural declines in existing fields rather than expanding supply.
The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that $540 billion annually is needed just to maintain current production levels through 2050, yet current investments fall short.
Alarmingly, 90% of global oil and gas production comes from post-peak fields with steep decline rates—5.6% annually for oil and 6.8% for gas.
Without ramped-up exploration, oil output could drop by 8% per year (over 5.5 million bpd), potentially halving global production by 2035.
Discoveries are increasingly concentrated in hotspots like Guyana and Brazil, while unconventional fields (e.g., shale) decline rapidly—up to 35% in the first year.
To offset losses, the world needs an additional 45 million bpd of new oil and 2,000 billion cubic meters of new gas from conventional fields by 2050.
This underinvestment signals a “critical junction,” risking supply shortages, price volatility, and energy security threats.
What Investors Should Watch For: Shifting from Glut to Scarcity
Contrary to fears of a prolonged oil glut, the data point to an emerging supply crunch driven by insufficient new field development. Investors should pivot from short-term price dips to long-term opportunities in resilient assets. Key indicators to monitor include:Exploration Hotspots: Focus on companies active in high-potential areas like Guyana (e.g., ExxonMobil’s Stabroek Block) or Brazil’s pre-salt basins, where discoveries are bucking the global trend.
OPEC+ Compliance and Geopolitics: Track adherence to compensation cuts and any shifts in quotas post-March 2026. Venezuela’s recovery could add supply, but geopolitical risks—such as U.S. sanctions or regional instability—may delay it.
Investment Flows: Watch for upstream capex increases beyond maintenance levels. Firms prioritizing new discoveries over dividends may outperform as shortages loom.
Demand Signals: With global demand steady, any production shortfalls could spike prices above $60/bbl sustainably. Diversify into integrated majors with strong balance sheets to weather volatility.
Policy Shifts: Government incentives for exploration or transitions to hybrids (e.g., carbon capture) could signal bullish trends.
In summary, January’s OPEC dip underscores immediate vulnerabilities, but the real story is the industry’s failure to invest in tomorrow’s supply. As Stuart Turley often highlights on the Energy News Beat podcast, we’re not drowning in oil—we’re starving for new sources. Investors who spot the signs early stand to gain in this tightening market.
Sources: Energynewsbeat.co, bloomberg.com, aljazeera.com,
Get your CEO on the podcast: https://sandstoneassetmgmt.com/media/
Is oil and gas right for your portfolio? https://sandstoneassetmgmt.com/invest-in-oil-and-gas/
Be the first to comment